There is at least 1 frame of lag when the data transits from one element to the other (something that didn't happened on older machines, since the two elements were combined in one). Other machines like the MVS use the old one, so they don't have any.Īlso, the machines based on a PC like the Type-X have two separate elements (?), one being the main element, and the other the signal element. The Type-X (and X2) use the new JAMA model, which ALWAYS produces lag. Sorry for the rough translation, I'm not very keen on computer architecture and stuff : But if someone has any clue about technical stuff, I would be interested to hear more (I know how knowledgeable the MMC posters can be after the insightful comments on SF2HD here). Of course, there is no way to know how reliable is the poster, and it might well be total bullshit. Just today, I found an interesting post on a 98UM BBS. It seems the lag is much lighter in the finished product, but it's still there, more or less. You might remember the first location tests of KOF 98UM, when many people complained about the imput lag. "Lag problem on Taito's Type X : truth ?", posted Mon 24 Mar 19:40
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |